Mormons, Ritual Worship, and Other Mysterious Things
One of the most distinguishing
characteristics of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints,
particularly among those of other Christian faiths, is our emphasis
on ritual. This certainly contributes to the sense of mistrust felt
by some protestants toward Latter-day Saints (a.k.a. Mormons). Of
course, the Catholic faith and the various Orthodox churches contain
a great deal of ritual. However, the Latter-day Saints are probably
unique in the amount of direct participation by ordinary church
members in ritual worship.
Before I go further, I'll clarify some
terminology, as I have done previously. The name of our church is the
Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. The short form of this
is the Church of Jesus Christ or, less formally, the LDS Church.
Members of our church are called Latter-day Saints, or sometimes “the
LDS people.” Terms such as Mormons, Mormonism, or “the Mormon
Church,” are incorrect. These are nicknames given to us by others
because of our belief in The Book of Mormon. While these names are
not offensive, I will only use the correct ones here.
Now continuing with the main topic:
there is a natural aversion toward ritual among protestants, due to
the fact that the protestant movement occurred in part as a revolt
against excessive ritualism. Much of the ritual and imagery in the
Catholic and Orthodox churches was viewed by the reformers as
idolatry. They opted for a simpler religion, centered around personal
faith and reading of the Bible. However, such rituals as the
Sacrament of the Lord's Supper and baptism were retained by most
protestant congregations, as these were strongly supported by the New
Testament.
Ironically, a similar sentiment has led
to the Latter-day Saints avoiding outward symbols of their faith,
such as crosses. Likewise, our rituals – which we call “Gospel
ordinances,” or just “ordinances” - are very simple in nature,
and ornate or dramatic presentation are eschewed. So, in a sense, we
have taken this Protestant aversion a step further. We are often
asked about the fact that we don't wear crosses, or display them on
our meeting houses. Another reason for this is to signify that we
worship the “living” Christ. While the suffering and death of
Jesus are at the very core our faith, we choose to emphasize the fact
that “He is not here, for he is risen.”
One of the most noticeable aspects of
our faith is the fact that we build temples, largely because the
temples themselves are quite noticeable. The architecture of these
buildings again reflects the Latter-day Saint sentiment toward
ritual: they are beautiful, but not ornate. Much is made of the fact
that we don't speak much about what goes on in our temples, even
amongst ourselves. In fact, those who have participated in these
ordinances only discuss them with each other in a general way, when
they are not inside a temple.
Latter-day Saint Temple Near Washington D.C. |
This secretiveness, of course, appears
very strange to those who don't have any analogous practices in their
own religions. Beyond that, in our culture we have an intrinsic
mistrust toward any group of people that is secretive or private.
For instance, it's become common
practice for secret government agencies to be blamed for just about
everything that goes on in the world. Such ideas have certainly been
helped along by media sensationalism. At times, elected officials
have even exploited this mistrust in order to divert blame, and our
intelligence agencies have thus become a popular scape goat.
Throughout history, various
groups have been singled out as being the cause of the world's
problems. Groups that were secretive, or just private, were the
common targets. For centuries the Jews were the favorite pick. Then
Hitler extended that a little, declaring that the Jews and the Free
Masons were the cause of every evil in the world. The Gypsies were
also a popular choice. Every propagandist needs a boogie man, and
suspicion is easily raised wherever there's a hint of secrecy.
Of course, in regards to temple worship
in the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, these are not
really secrets in the traditional sense. After all, we don't even
discuss them in private with others who already know these “secrets.”
As rumor has it, this attitude of discretion has made the LDS people
attractive for recruitment by employers who deal with classified
information. Whether there's any validity to this rumor, I don't
know, but it's wonderful fodder for all sorts of conspiracy theories.
Moreover, the fact we don't discuss our temple ordinances publicly
has left the door open to others, usually former members of our
church, to present a distorted view of what goes on there.
So why on earth would we be afraid to
discuss a secret with someone who already knows it? Are we afraid
we're being spied on? Or maybe that the room has been wiretapped?
Well, it's nothing quite so shadowy. Actually, this is why we
typically refer to such things as “sacred” rather than “secret.”
The concept of sacredness is an ancient one, but has lost much of
it's meaning in contemporary society. The common expression, “Is
nothing sacred?” is a reflection of this.
Historically, it's very common for
participants in temple worship to be given a “hush order.”
Descriptions of this can be found in manuscripts and the like from
numerous civilizations. While some biblical scholars have suggested
that the Old Testament temple rites were adopted by the Hebrews from
their Pagan neighbors, I take profound exception to this notion. The
idea that God is simply so short on ideas that he would borrow them
from men doesn't sit well with me. Nor would it, I imagine, with most
Christians. Rather, I would suggest, that it is in fact the other way
around: That God is the originator of temple worship, and it was
adopted, and altered, by men. The actual rituals have varied wildly
from one culture to another, but there are many common threads. And
it's the common threads that likely trace back to the source.
Interestingly, there are ancient texts
that suggest that the biblical description of Israelite temple
worship is not the whole story. But, before you let your mind run
wild, it should be noted that we're not talking about anything very
bazaar here. In fact, it would be difficult for an observer to
understand why any of it was kept secret. Again, it's sacred, not
secret. Or rather, it was kept secret because it was sacred, and it
was sacred because God declared it to be so.
Such things can be difficult to grasp
the reasons for, and may naturally engender suspicion. It exposes a
paradox in our natures: I may have difficulty trusting someone who
keeps a secret from me, but I have no difficulty trusting someone who
keeps a secret for me. Thus, whether or not we trust someone may have
nothing to do with whether they are actually trustworthy.
Understandably, there are aspects of
the Church of Jesus Christ that may seem very strange to outsiders,
both in our history and in our current practices. However, rather
than attempting to explain them all, I would point out that there are
many strange things in the Old Testament, and even the New Testament.
It might seem very strange to a non-Christian to learn that
Christians participate in a ritual where they drink wine and eat
bread, signifying that they are drinking the blood and eating the
flesh of their deity. This was a common thread of anti-Christian
literature in the Roman world. So much depends on presentation and
perspective, and very benign concepts can seem quite sinister when
deprived of context.
The Old Testament presents us with many
troubling passages, that as Christians we often accept either by
faith or by ignorance. We may seek an explanation, or we may set
them aside for later. But that doesn't mean we set our faith aside
until we have answers for every question. Whether we speak of
Christianity generally, or our particular sect, we all accept the
controversial history of our faith. The only difference is time and
space.
As members of the Church of Jesus
Christ of Latter-day Saints, we sometimes experience attacks on our
faith. A common accusation is that we are a cult, and that we are not
really Christians. It's funny how people like to throw around
inflammatory terms without really knowing what they mean. So then,
are we true Christians, or are we a cult? Well, first of all, what is
a cult? A quick Google search for “define cult” returns the
following: “A
system of religious veneration and devotion directed toward a
particular figure or object.” Then the next question is, how do you
define “Christianity?” Do you define it as Pastor Jeffress does:
As the the collective of Churches that embrace the Nicaean Creed?
If,
however, you define Christianity as, “A system of religious
veneration and devotion directed toward Jesus Christ, 'the author and
finisher of our faith,'” then the answer as to whether Latter-day
Saints are Christians or a cult is simply, “Yes.”
Comments
Post a Comment